Archive for the ‘Soapbox’ Category

Oct
7

Words About Words

A few weeks ago, I was seeing some chatter concerning a certain Absolut Vodka spot and its similarity to Stefan Sagmeister’s type experiments. There were definitely some loaded words thrown around, like “copy” and “rip-off” and such.

Now, creativity and credit are no small things to me, but I think this may be a case of people wanting to be outraged about something – not unlike the people complaining about the use of the music in such an awfully commercial way. Perhaps it is a case of “pure art” vs. commercialism – perhaps some object to Sagmeister’s “pure” concept being the inspiration for an ad peddling vodka – but in general I find this to be a waste of time, discussions of art vs. commercialism, “selling out,” etc.

We all find inspiration in great work, and Sagmeister’s original type experiments were great. Something I’ve seen before – and have certainly been guilty of myself – is trying to emulate your inspiration but falling short. This isn’t that, though. They took the same idea – making a statement – literally – through creating type from surroundings. However, where Sagmeister executed his vision with still photography, the Absolut spot is video throughout, which gives it a distinctly different feel. I also think the shots of artists crafting the words are particularly powerful. Overall, I feel like the Absolut spot has a bit more ‘polish.’

I mean no disrespect to Stefan Sagmeister – in fact, I think his work is amazing. By way of illustration, it’s like the difference between the initial groundbreaking work of developers on multitouch display tables and the later, more polished versions, like the Microsoft Surface. I don’t believe that the creators of the Absolut spot were stealing from Sagmeister. It is merely my opinion, but I feel that by executing well and bringing new touches to the table, they have seen further by standing on the shoulders of a giant.

Nov
4

A change is gonna come

It may be a very worn cliche, but America has spoken. It’s been a terribly exciting night.

I’m proud to have voted for Senator, and now President-Elect Obama. I spent the whole day feeling very anxious, but as the evening wore on, I became more and more encouraged by the news… and when CNN moved Sen. Obama’s electoral total to 297, I was ecstatic, and for a while was shouting out to folks online, sending texts, and fixating on the electoral votes creeping higher.

But, you know, when Sen. McCain spoke, conceding the election, I started to think, maybe it’s time now to come together. Maybe it’s idealism, but I am, in my best moments, I would say, an idealist. On any given problem, I would like to move forward by finding common ground rather than getting my way through superior force. (Perhaps a statement to be made about foreign policy?)

As President-Elect Obama spoke at Grant Park in Chicago, that message was again driven home – we are in many ways a divided nation, but we are never better than when we are united. I’ve read opinions that the younger generations in America, who have grown up with general cynicism about government and did not go through the crushing loss of JFK, and all of the hope and vigah that he inspired, were ready to hope. I think that perhaps we need to hope, and to believe. Well, Barack Obama is someone who can make you believe, but more than that, he seems to actually inspire. Listening to him speak, my instinct is: “Yes, there are things that have to be fixed, wrongs to be righted. How can I help, what should I do?”

He said tonight that he needs our help. He reminded us that he will be President of the whole country, not just those who voted for him. He reminded us that the job of change is not done – in fact, it’s just beginning. It’s time to roll up our sleeves and get to work.

To quote Sam Cooke, “a change is gonna come.”

Yes, we can.

Oct
14

“I have read about him, and he’s an Arab.”

Over the weekend, I saw an article on CNN that I just want to talk a little bit about, because quite frankly I can’t get it out of my head.

Since this is kind of a political post, I will issue a disclaimer up front – I’ve already decided that I’m supporting Sen. Obama. Having said that, that isn’t what this post is about at all – I won’t be trying to convince you that you should vote for him.

What I want to talk about is this article [source] that tells of a woman at a rally who stated, “I don’t trust Obama. I have read about him and he’s an Arab.”

This is what has been bothering me. For one thing, the ignorance of that statement frightens me a little bit. An Arab would be someone from, or with ancestry from, Arabia, or the Middle East as we often call it. Sen. Barack Obama is the son of a man from Kenya (which, if you’ll consult your atlases, is not in Arabia) and a white woman from Kansas (which is most definitely not in Arabia – I do hope we can all get together on that.)

I don’t know if that woman was confused about his heritage, but I suspect that she was trying to suggest that Sen. Obama is a Muslim. First of all, he is not – every respectable media outlet has fact-checked that, thanks to that rumor that keeps coming back (thank you internet) – and I was pleased that Sen. McCain was good enough to correct her. Secondly, it seems to imply that being a Muslim is somehow bad or un-American.

Now, this just makes me angry. I am not Muslim – I grew up in the Episcopal Church. But I also like to learn a little bit about the world around me, and I try not to be ignorant. And I am infuriated by this thought-process since Sept. 11th that Arab = Muslim = Terrorist.

Let’s get a few things straight. While Europe was in the midst of the “Dark Ages,” Muslims in Arabia were rediscovering and expanding upon the learnings of Classicism (Greek and Roman learning), practicing math, science, astronomy, medicine, and other disciplines at a level that it would take Europe until the Renaissance to catch up to. So let’s not hate.

Muslims are people who practice the religion of Islam. It quite literally means “submission” – submission to the God of Abraham, who they call Allah. Of the Five Pillars, which constitute the chief practices of “good” Muslims, one of them is zakat, or alms-giving. Muslims are called upon to help those less fortunate than themselves, to work to eliminate the inequalities in this world that lead to suffering. Other core beliefs include declaring their belief in Allah, praying, making pilgrimage, and fasting. If these are the marks of an evil people, I’ll be on their side, please.

People point to many violent extremist acts that are carried out in the name of Islam – the so-called Islamic Terrorists. Yes, there are terrible people who claim Islam as the reason that they do what they do. But I would ask any Christian – is the KKK a good reference for the religion you believe in? The Klan claimed Christianity and used Scripture to support their atrocities.

But let’s dig a little further. If Islam is, as I believe, a peaceful faith, practiced by 1.5 billion people, where are these extremists coming from? The poorest places on earth, generally. There are rich extremists, yes. Osama Bin Laden comes from a very wealthy family. In some of the poorest countries – where the populace is generally impoverished and the government lacks either the means or the will to provide education, medical care, or food for the hungry, these rich extremists are the ones filling the need. In Three Cups of Tea (see my previous post), Greg Mortenson relates seeing radical madrassas pop up in the rural highlands of Pakistan, and hears accounts of wealthy men from Saudi Arabia coming with suitcases of cash to build them. Extremist ideologies take hold in these places because, frankly, no one else is helping the people out – the hand that feeds you, educates you, and keeps your family alive will ultimately be the hand that affects your view of the world.

And one last thing – yes, Sen. Barack Obama’s middle name is Hussein. It’s not just the last name of Iraq’s former leader. It’s an incredibly common name with many spellings, depending on region and varying over the centuries. So if I could stop seeing forwarded emails and internet comments about “Barack HUSSEIN Obama” (as if a middle name that was given to him is somehow proof that he “hates freedom”), that would be fantastic.

So this is my plea – please, please, let’s calm down and learn a little bit about the world around us. And maybe we can even extend a helping hand and take a stab at fixing the root problems that have lead to so much intolerance, hatred, and death.

(P.S. I think it’s worth reading Campbell Brown’s commentary on the issue. It certainly bears repeating.)

Feb
5

I read the news today… did you?

It’s my birthday, and I woke up this morning to a CNN headline, “Kenyan death toll reaches 1,000.”

Great news to start out my day, but in perspective, it’s worse news for the people who live there.

I’m gonna go out on a limb and guess that folks reading this (if there is, after all, anyone reading this) don’t have a real good grip on the situation, or, you know, what’s going on at all. I’ve been following it, so I’ll do my best to write about it briefly.

The Kenyan election was held in December. Sitting President Mwai Kibaki was up for reelection, running against opposition leader Raila Odinga. Kibaki took over 5 years ago from President Daniel Arap Moi, an unquestionably corrupt leader who ruled the country for 24 years thanks to a lack of term limits (a deficiency that was remedied in 1992). Kibaki previously campaigned as a reformer, but some argue that he hasn’t done enough (it’s been estimated that $1 billion was lost to graft between 2002 and 2005 [source]). Seems to me that he’s playing with a pretty big handicap, and everyone I talked to about politics there were Kibaki supporters, but I was only there for three weeks – I can’t claim to have anything close to expertise here.

Anyway, Kibaki was announced as the winner, but it appears that the vote was rigged – there may have even been rigging on both sides. What started as protests, and then rioting, over the election results took on ethnic overtones – Kibaki is Kikuyu, the most populous ethnic group, Odinga is Luo, and support often runs along ethnic divides. It seems that it began with incidents of Luo targeting Kikuyu, and then Kikuyu mobs started to form in reprisal… feeding the ethnic divides is a historic sense of disenfranchisement – valuable land taken from other ethnic groups by British colonists was given predmoninatly to Kikuyus upon independence. Some have posed the point: “Wasn’t this, you know, a while ago? Why can’t they just get along?” While I don’t deny the logic there – land, political power, business connections – these things can be and probably are the difference between success and poverty. Working your way up or struggling/failing to feed your family. So it’s kind of a big deal.

Anyway, death toll just reached 1,000. Truth is, in terms of past and current conflicts, this is (and it kills me to say this) pretty small. Civil war in Chad, humanitarian violations in Sudan going on for years… this still pales in comparison. For me, it’s because I’ve been there – fallen in love with the country, and I’m worried sick about the people that I met there. On a larger scale, Kenya has been an oasis of peace and an economic leader in the area. It’s a trade hub for the area and a strong U.S. ally [source]. This conflict threatens business, internally and for the region, and it will likely have catastrophic effects on tourism, which is a huge part of the country’s economy.

So I’m just waiting and watching. Hoping this was informative.

Further reading:
Country profile: Kenya
Kenya: In Diplomatic Intensive Care
Kenyan death toll reaches 1,000
‘Hard’ Kenya crisis talks resume
Gang rape spirals in violent Kenya
Fragile path of Kenya peacemaking